Categorized | SEO Q&A's

25 Comments For This Post

1. wearealltubes Says:
   October 8th, 2009 at 3:30 pm

   Wikipedia has nofollow everywhere and we all know how valuable a link from that site is!

2. slicksterdave Says:
   October 10th, 2009 at 7:30 am

   one of the strategies you suggested about link exchange is actually wrong.

   Google’s servers check for keyword relations between source and destinations during links, both 1-way and 2-way.

   Lower relations mean diminishing your pagerank-related reputation/score.

   Just thought people should know that before they start to plaster the internet with UN-related domains they’re using to redirect content to their less popular websites.

3. freeaman Says:
   October 12th, 2009 at 5:49 am

   good video. Cheers

4. TheWealthyPromoter Says:
   October 12th, 2009 at 11:54 pm

   Ok after over a week of deliberating over SocialBlaster, I made my decision today to go with this has been the next best decision I have made in a long time.

   Simple, and very effective…update to 40 + networks with multiple accounts

   NO MORE iMACROS bullchyt for me…THANK GOD!!

5. clees3161 Says:
   October 13th, 2009 at 11:43 am

   NOFOLLOW doesn’t really mean that google doesn’t follow the link. It just means that PR is not passed. Google still reads the text and thus it has significance. Yahoo doesn’t care about nofollow. I build site just for yahoo and use nofollow links to achieve easy rankings. Also, check the “buy viagra” niche and you’ll see there isn’t a single “natural” link profile on the first 4 pages, yet google consistently ranks these pages!

6. wilreynolds Says:
   October 16th, 2009 at 10:49 pm

   I think it was SEO Quake that I was referring to here.

7. MegaCommenter Says:
   October 19th, 2009 at 6:06 am

   I Agree.Link Building is an important process that increases your website popularity, it is a one-time investment that saves a lot of advertising expenditure and your time. It greatly affects your websites page ranking on different search engines like Google, Yahoo, MSN and others.

8. tehmushroom Says:
   October 20th, 2009 at 1:33 pm

   Could you tell me which tool/ff addon you mentioned in the video? I thought I heard SEO chat, but couldn’t find the add on.

9. IRSFRAUDEXPOSED Says:
   October 22nd, 2009 at 7:58 am

   in my continued research my biggest comp are doing the same thing it turns out they have paid banner adds on a forum and the link is counted as inbound back link and the rest of there links are from the hundred pages interlinking to pages in there own site . the top sites in my topic all do this. Are the banner links sitewide – would i be better to have a keyphrase term link on the one page that is word specific in the url? do banner adds help seo or just drivin traffic?

10. IRSFRAUDEXPOSED Says:
    October 23rd, 2009 at 11:00 am

    thank you for the reply – i just used your tip and found out what my biggest competitor has in links . They have a google backlink listing of hundreds half are withing there own site and they have about a hundred pages …it seems that having tons of pages all with links to the other pages is counting as backlinks?
    My seopen result show 1 link listed on google , Yet yahoo shows hundreds , msn 0, if google shows 1 backlink am i loosing out because they dont show them all?

11. wilreynolds Says:
    October 26th, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    I don’t know specifically but it is not the number of backlinks it is the quality. So if half are from a forum site, more than likely google is not counting all of them with the same weight, look up “sitewides” and you’ll see that multiple links coming from the same domain get devalued.

12. wilreynolds Says:
    October 29th, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    Jeff, I really like this idea, next time I record a video maybe I can touch on this a bit more. THx!

13. wilreynolds Says:
    November 1st, 2009 at 10:23 am

    my pleasure. I’m looking forward to having more to post soon.

14. IRSFRAUDEXPOSED Says:
    November 3rd, 2009 at 4:36 pm

    looking at a major competitor i see they have hundreds of backlinks half are from pages in there own website and the rest are from a forum site, and yet i have NONE and i know of dozens that exist and arnt listed by google let alone others…what gives?

15. JeffSMills Says:
    November 4th, 2009 at 8:39 am

    It would be swell of you to discuss how to create a natural linking profile. Google will get better at sniffing out off-page SEO campaigns. Some things to consider in simulating natural linking might be anchor text variation, link acquisition rate congruent with traffic, mix of do/no-follow links, some exposed url links… getting the link mix & ratio right as not to draw attention to an ill advised off-page SEO campaign.

16. mair31 Says:
    November 6th, 2009 at 8:23 am

    yeha great thought

17. mair31 Says:
    November 9th, 2009 at 2:27 am

    yeh a great thought specifically for the begginers

18. rajib2k5 Says:
    November 10th, 2009 at 3:14 pm

    thank you for sharing your ideas

19. wilreynolds Says:
    November 13th, 2009 at 2:27 pm

    Best of luck with your SEO company, glad I can help a bit,

20. luckycharm3366 Says:
    November 15th, 2009 at 11:49 pm

    I learned a lot frmo this, Thanks Will. I recently started my own SEO company and enjoy learning from you

21. wilreynolds Says:
    November 18th, 2009 at 1:13 am

    I just deleted those awful comments. Sorry they were around for so long.

22. wilreynolds Says:
    November 19th, 2009 at 3:46 pm

    Glad you are getting it Colloseusx

23. wilreynolds Says:
    November 21st, 2009 at 1:36 am

    Thank you! Just now seeing this comment.

24. avzull Says:
    November 22nd, 2009 at 2:14 am

    hegemonies! No one cares 🙂

25. djschum84 Says:
    November 22nd, 2009 at 11:23 am

    How does this help when you can’t see what he is doing??

Leave a Reply